gold rush pictures australia

images Even though the gold rush gold rush pictures australia. gold rush australia
  • gold rush australia



  • sledge_hammer
    11-25 08:06 PM
    I still would not put the blame on the lender. Nobody put a gun to your head and asked you to buy a home. You, out of your own volition, went to the lender after all the shopping you did for rates, then settled with one lender and signed the contract. Why is it the lender's fault for lending you money when you needed it? Why didnt you finanance the whole purchase yourself? You didn't have that kind of money, right? So what the lender did was charge you interest, as a fee for loaning you the money. So the builder/owner of the home got his money from the bank and left. Now the two parties involved are you and the lender. And it is your obligation to pay the loan whether the home appreciates or depriciates. Like Canadian_Dream already said, any investment has risk associated with it. You should have paid attention to it before signing the contract. Have you ever invested in a stocks or mutual funds? There is always a disclaimer that there is a certain amount of risk involved. The investment in real estate is just like that. It is not like putting away money in a savings account which is insured by FDIC.

    If someone is dumb enough not to know these things he should not be investing in the first place!

    Yup, that was my point - both are greedy :)....so no point blaming any 1 party. And agree with you that foreclosure is only an option if you 'really' can't pay your monthly dues and that too for a sustained period of time - if one has the money to pay the monthly mortgage, one should continue to pay it off even if the asset value as plummeted to rock bottom because that is what you have singed in for - the amount of loan you took out to buy that house. No excuse from that!

    Foreclosing just because you can't make short term profit on it is simply in-excusable.





    wallpaper gold rush australia gold rush pictures australia. gold rush australia map.
  • gold rush australia map.



  • Foster2007
    07-09 06:55 PM
    I think the blood drive is a great idea...draws media attention and serves a just cause!!!

    Calling IV leadership to organize this all across the country!!!


    What you guys are talking about ... Walter reed is the best place for the flowers to go, with all what is going on in there ... the media will eat this news . DO not Cancel whatever you Do do not cancel instead call the media and let them know........... This is even better.

    Can we do a blood drive next as protest! seriously. Donate blood as protest and for media attention.





    gold rush pictures australia. 2011 gold rush australia map.
  • 2011 gold rush australia map.



  • asanghi
    05-17 07:03 PM
    Does one need to be physically present in US in order to file I-485 application? I had already booked my travel to India on May 25th before I came to know that the my Priority Dates had become current. Will I need to be in US till I get the filing receipt? I was curious on how would UCSIS know that I'm out of country on the day of filing?

    Thanks

    How will USCIS will know? They have all your immigration related documents including I-94. They can track all of your movements.





    2011 gold rush australia map. gold rush pictures australia. Gold+rush+australia+kids
  • Gold+rush+australia+kids



  • gc_chahiye
    06-20 09:30 PM
    Thanks for posting this I was searching for some advise on this aspect ....

    I have one questions based on this comment :

    If a person uses one of his I-140s and the adjustment is for some
    reason denied, it appears that there is no reason why they can not then
    re-apply for adjustment using the other approved I-140 providing all the
    requirements are met under the petition.

    So lets say Husbands 485 gets deined for some reason and the wife has an approved I 140 but her PD is not current any more, can the substiution still happen or are the couple doomed?

    Please respond.

    AA

    this is what I understand:
    the wife can continue on her H1 extensions. The husband can stay until the current H1 expires. For future extensions he will need a fresh PERM/I-140 (since PD is not current).

    Might be worth filing separately now, and joining the spouse's petition once its approved. From what I have read so far (CHECK WITH ATTORNEY) you can add your spouse to your I-485 within 180 days of approval, if you were married before it got approved.



    more...


    gold rush pictures australia. gold rush pictures australia.
  • gold rush pictures australia.



  • FinalGC
    08-12 03:20 PM
    Congrats FinalGC..

    Did you do something. I am from NJ too. Did you contact any congressmen or senators from NJ?

    I am currently in Michigan...I only opened a SR on 8/5, nothing else. Had a letter for my son's FP on 7/20, since he turned 14 this year; when we did in 10/2007, they only took a thumb print for my son, since he was under age.





    gold rush pictures australia. gold rush map australia. gold
  • gold rush map australia. gold



  • Macaca
    12-05 05:17 PM
    AMY GOODMAN: Another guest that you�ve had on the show�now, this is a very important point, and this is one that you would agree that you�ve covered, and that is Arizona�this is very important�the Protect Arizona Now referendum. In late 2004, it was revealed that the new head of the national advisory board to Protect Arizona Now, an anti-immigration organization, was a longtime white supremacist who was also an editorial advisor to the racist Council of Conservative Citizens. Although Virginia Abernethy�s controversial selection was reported prominently in virtually every Arizona paper, and despite the fact that Lou Dobbs heavily cover the anti-immigration referendum that Protect Arizona Now was advocating, you never mentioned the affair at all, her controversial selection as head of this group.

    LOU DOBBS: And she was featured in how many reports?

    AMY GOODMAN: The point is, you covered Protect Arizona Now extensively, and this is certainly significant, when it turns out that the head of the board of Protect Arizona Now is�

    LOU DOBBS: And when was the last time she was on the show?

    AMY GOODMAN: No, the important point is, you didn�t report the news of this very controversial�

    LOU DOBBS: Is it possible�

    AMY GOODMAN: �racist woman who headed Protect Arizona Now, which was virtually in every Arizona paper. The question is�

    LOU DOBBS: Concurrent with our reporting?

    AMY GOODMAN: �what you report and what you don�t.

    LOU DOBBS: Concurrent with our reporting?

    AMY GOODMAN: Of course. This is in 2004. The point is, what you report, Lou, and what you don�t report.

    LOU DOBBS: Well, you know, Amy, I don�t know what to tell you, because, you know, based on your focus here today, you have focused on probably three or four reports, as best I can figure, out of more than five years of reporting on the issue. If that smacks at all to you of reasonable proportionate journalism on your part, I mean, God bless you. If that�s what you believe, God bless you. But I think you�re coming from an ideological position that has just absolutely skewed that perception and that perspective.

    AMY GOODMAN: I admit my ideological position, which is that I think that the Council of Conservative Citizens is a racist group, and it�s problematic�

    LOU DOBBS: OK. And I think that you are a wonderful, pure and absolute infallible human being.

    AMY GOODMAN: �not to identify guests that you have on your show that are connected with this group.

    LOU DOBBS: Unfortunately, I am a fallible, and I am a man who has made some mistakes. But the reality is, the body of work stands for itself, and you know that. And the reality is, the facts are irresistible. Illegal immigration into this country is absolutely not in the American interest. And that is a reality you�re going to have to contend with.

    JUAN GONZALEZ: Lou, no, that fact is not clear. You know, first of all�

    LOU DOBBS: Not to you.



    more...


    gold rush pictures australia. pictures house of gold rush
  • pictures house of gold rush



  • sweet_jungle
    11-03 04:02 PM
    I agree with you this thread should be closed. Please see my original message. I accomplished, which I set to accomlish. No point in lingering on this issue.


    sorry, I never saw this thread.
    Could you describe in a few lines what you accomplished and what were your intentions?





    2010 2011 gold rush australia map. gold rush pictures australia. Even though the gold rush
  • Even though the gold rush



  • logiclife
    06-15 01:40 PM
    I filed a G28 to allow me to represent my wife. I did not use an attorney. If you are filing for more than one person then I think that a G28 is worth it. It is a trivial form.

    Will correct the first post accordingly.



    more...


    gold rush pictures australia. 2010 Gold Rush of Australia,
  • 2010 Gold Rush of Australia,



  • GCKaIntezar
    05-18 03:57 PM
    Hi All-
    Any ideas where can I get the latest specs for the individual photos (I485 filing purpose). I searched the web but couldn't find a USCIS document. I heard they no longer accept the 75 degree looking face.

    Thanks in advance.


    From http://www.immigration-law.com/

    05/17/2007: USCIS Terminates 05/18/2007 PPS for Labor Certification Substitution I-140 Petitions

    USCIS announced today that beginning on Friday, May 18, 2007, it will terminate Premium Processing Service for Form I-140 petitions that request labor certification substitution. USCIS anticipates a substantial increase in the number of petitioning employers that will file Form I-140 petitions requesting Premium Processing Service and seeking labor certification substitution prior to July 16, 2007. The volume of such petitions filed requesting Premium Process Service is expected to exceed USCIS� capacity to provide the Premium Process Service according to the program guidelines. For the announcement, please click here.

    http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/PPSPermRule051707.pdf





    hair Gold+rush+australia+kids gold rush pictures australia. Australia#39;s gold rush.
  • Australia#39;s gold rush.



  • jsb
    09-22 04:49 PM
    When calling USCIS did anybody question, if they have not yet entered even July 2 filings, why do their weekly updates indicate otherwise. It is very pertinent question and a very valid point to be taken to a congressman.



    more...


    gold rush pictures australia. first gold rush and is
  • first gold rush and is



  • Powersa
    07-09 09:59 PM
    This is just a message to 2005/2006/2007 PD guys. Please don't think that some miracle will happen and dates will be current soon, it will take its own time. Mostly for EB2 & EB3June 2006- June 2007 guys, it will be like a lottery if the PD becomes current somewhere in 2007 Oct-Nov time. Right??
    So life is not always easy. There are people waiting since 2002-03-04.
    Don't think that life is not a FIFO always.

    Why some of the guys became violent when I said, INDIA IS GREAT???
    Guys.. do you know why I always feel like this???

    As my parents,in laws and most of my relatives stay there. Not only mine, allmost all guys who are in the IV, they must have parents and relatives in India for sure. There is no other reason why I said India is great.

    Someone asked me to pack up... YES, I will if nothing happens;however, I will be waiting to see the progress for sure. This is July. Let's have a look over OCT bulletin after 2 months and for sure dates will move atleast 4-6 months for EB2 guys and 1 year for EB3 guys. So wait, be patient, instead of doing all this.
    Anyway, our turn will come sooner or later, so why to become impatient just seeing the JULY bulletin CURRENT and then "U".

    Mainly this is the message for 2005-2006-2007 PD guys. Please don't take it otherwise.


    Take it easy...PD means FIFO.

    So...long story short, don't worry, you will get your GC prior to the "2005/2006/2007 PD guys".

    I'm one of those guys, lol.





    hot gold rush pictures australia. gold rush pictures australia. 2011 gold rush map australia.
  • 2011 gold rush map australia.



  • sc3
    08-20 09:54 PM
    Also, how is the spillover going to be distributed among EB3? First EB3 ROW and then EB3 C/I as in the old system?

    Personally, I think the visa recapture bill would help things quite a bit.

    The idea here is to get USCIS to follow the law

    Yes, the old system will be restored. Please note that this is the only sure fire way of EB3-I going forward. There is some comments that EB3-I can really only benefit if EB2-I goes current with the current horizontal spill over rules. Such statements are clearly misleading. Eb3-I will not directly be impacted by EB2-I being current. It just allows EB3 to get a lot of numbers which will first be used by EB3-ROW before spilling over into EB3-I.


    With this change, we get EB3ROW move ahead faster, it probably would have been C had the rules been followed, and EB3 would have started moving ahead.

    The only way for EB3 to move ahead is for EB3-ROW to become current, nothing else will help EB3 beyond the visa recapture (which is iffy at best). If we get USCIS to follow rules, this happens sooner, and EB3-I starts to move sooner. If not, EB3-I shall wait for a long time.



    more...


    house gold rush map australia. gold rush pictures australia. gold rush australia chinese.
  • gold rush australia chinese.



  • nkavjs
    09-25 02:29 PM
    Good idea.. Can we come up with Joint signed E-letter with info and mail it to these guys doing nothing with our 2nd July applications.
    They shd all be flown to Bermuda triangle (ony after they clear our pending applications)





    tattoo gold rush map australia. gold gold rush pictures australia. gold rush australia kids.
  • gold rush australia kids.



  • aadimanav
    01-03 12:55 AM
    Source:
    http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&artMonth=January&artYear=2008&EntryNo=7723

    Delay In The Age Of Security - Employee Green Card Woes

    Geoffrey Forney
    WolfBlock
    Geoffrey Forney is an Associate in WolfBlock's Employment Services Practice Group and is a member of the group's Immigration Services Team. Geoffrey handles all aspects of immigration and nationality law, including employment- and family-based immigration, removal (deportation) defense and asylum.

    Many human resources representatives who handle immigration matters are well aware that dealing with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) can be confusing and at times frustrating. The agency has volumes of regulations, policies, decisions and guidelines governing the admission and employment of foreign nationals. Understanding the agency's requirements can be an overwhelming task. In addition, the agency's decision process is often obscure, leaving employers and foreign nationals guessing about the procedures that affect them directly.

    Added to the confusion is the baffling situation of the excessively long-delayed adjudication of green card and naturalization applications. Employers spend a lot of time and money to sponsor valued foreign national employees only to find that the last stage of the process (adjustment of status or "green" card) is bogged down within a quagmire of endless and seemingly unexplainable delay. Applicants for green cards can face delays up to seven years or more. From an HR perspective, the situation is frustrating: all of the employee's appropriate paperwork has been filed, but the USCIS simply refuses to act on the application. Employers and foreign nationals make inquires with the USCIS only to be told that their applications are being held up because of "security" issues.

    What "security" issues? Many foreign nationals are upset by this response, because they know that they have never had any contacts with law enforcement. Just because a foreign national is caught in security clearance delays does not necessarily mean that the person has had problems with law enforcement authorities. In the vast majority of cases, it simply means that the foreign national's name matches in some way a name in an FBI administrative file. Only after the USCIS confirms that the foreign national is not the same individual who is listed in the FBI administrative file will the USCIS proceed with the adjudication of the green card or naturalization application. It sounds simple enough, so why does this process take so long?

    Congress requires the USCIS to perform criminal background checks on foreign nationals applying to become permanent residents (green card holders) or naturalized citizens of the United States. In addition to the Congressionally mandated criminal background check, DHS performs two other background checks on foreign nationals applying for green cards or citizenship. The criminal background check is a relatively easy and fast check: the USCIS obtains a fingerprint impression from the foreign national and checks this fingerprint image against the FBI's Criminal Master File. This check is usually completed within 48 hours, as it is largely a computer automated system. The second type of check, the Interagency Border Inspection System (IBIS) check, is also very quick. The IBIS check is based on a database containing information from 26 different federal agencies that includes information on persons of "interest" to law enforcement. This check is usually completed immediately upon entering the foreign national's name into a computer database.

    The problem arises with the third and final background check, known as the "name check." Although Congress does not require name checks, in 2002 legacy INS began requesting name checks for all green card and citizenship applications as part of its post-9/11 heightening of security. A "name check" is performed by taking every permutation of the foreign national's full name and comparing those various permutations against the FBI's "Universal Index," which references the FBI's Central Records System, a voluminous archive of administrative, personnel and investigative files. Of course, foreign nationals with common names will usually "match" an FBI file. In addition, a foreign national's name need not necessarily match a "main" file name, containing, for example, a suspect's name, but may match "reference" names, including informants and witnesses. Hence, the universe of possible matches is very large.

    Although the FBI usually responds to a USCIS request for a name check within two weeks, if there is a "hit" or match between one or more permutations of the foreign national's name, a more extensive search must be completed. If a secondary search does not clear the foreign national's name, the USCIS requests a manual investigation of the relevant FBI case files. Since a "match" ultimately leads to a manual inspection of physical files. The process is time and labor intensive. One of the main reasons for the excessive delays in this arena is the lack of resources devoted to the manual inspection of files. To date, the USCIS and FBI currently have more than 340,000 cases in the name check backlog, according to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman.

    As a result, a foreign national stuck in the name check backlog can expect to wait a very long time - a matter of years - before expecting a final adjudication of his or her application for a green card or citizenship. In some cases, a final resolution never occurs. It is not unusual to find applicants with unresolved cases that are more than five years old.

    Recently, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman cited "name check" delays as a major problem for the agency in his 2007 annual report. The Ombudsman questioned the utility and effectiveness of the name check process, noting that "[n]ame check[s] are not conducted by the FBI as part of an ongoing investigation or from a need to learn more about an individual because of any threat or risk perceived by the FBI." Furthermore, the Ombudsman suggested that the name check program does not comply with DHS Secretary Chertoff's risk management modeling, because the cost of name checks far outweighs the purported national security benefit: "Considering the protection the FBI name check provides, the cost of government resources used, and mental and actual hardships to applicants and their families, USCIS should reassess the continuation of its policy to require FBI name checks in their current form." Notwithstanding the Ombudsman's criticism of the name check program, other high-level USCIS officials continue to support the process, so it appears that name checks will remain a part of green card and naturalization applications.


    (Part 2 in the next post below)



    more...


    pictures pictures house of gold rush gold rush pictures australia. gold rush australia 1851. gold
  • gold rush australia 1851. gold



  • sri1309
    09-12 07:41 PM
    All,

    I will once again be writing and sending posters to all the reps. This is one of our chances where we can get closest. If we miss this then there will be lots of uncertainity. Imagine we already missed it. See how desperate all can get.

    We have some time, Lets all spend considerable time this weekend, get bigger charts, use lots of good eye catching color, make our voices heard. Spend considderable time this weekend on this, please. Together we all can make a difference. Please do your best and spread this across your friends also who are waiting or have got their greencards. This one thing sucked up so much energy from so many here. Please support EB2 and EB3. How does one get these greens. I never got any.. :(.


    Sri.





    dresses 2011 gold rush map australia. gold rush pictures australia. While Australia gold rush
  • While Australia gold rush



  • samnay
    09-10 03:49 PM
    Folks, got Decision email on 09/03, Approval email on 09/08. Does anyone how long does it take to get the CPO email and the actual card from here on?

    EB2 - Mar. 06

    Never got the CPO email but who cares? :-)

    Got the cards in the mail today! F*** 10 years of wait is over! Not sure if it was worth it but at least its over now!

    Good luck to everyone who is still waiting for theirs....hang in there!



    more...


    makeup 2010 Gold Rush of Australia, gold rush pictures australia. gold rush map australia.
  • gold rush map australia.



  • jainGC
    09-10 01:04 AM
    Hi All,

    Its been astonishing journey, came to US in 2000 June, saw downfall of .coms followed by Housing bubble burst, than 911 , than Economical challenges, Job losses, etc.... the irony list are/were endless. Hope of GC was next to impossible.

    Following were the steps to miracle :

    - Filed Labor in 2005 Dec, got denied due to lawyers mistake:mad:
    - Refiled the same application and Got approved in March 2006:D
    - Applied I-140, paid extra for premium but it took more than 4 months to approve.:mad:
    - Fight with employer, left company overnite, guess when ?(2 weeks before July Fiasco :mad:)
    - Refilled labor in Jan 2008, Got approved in March 2008
    - RFE on previously approved I-140
    - Convinced lawyers to file application for I-140 , requesting PD recapturing.
    - Got I-140 Approval in Aug 2008
    - Filed I-485 in Aug 2008
    - FP in Oct 2008
    - RFE in Aug 2009

    - Contacted Congressman, it was helpful as got to know the exact situation.
    - Took infopass 2 times
    - Not sure if this helped or not but called 1-800 number and spoke with level 2 officer and she hinted that I may not have to wait that long ?

    - Approval in Sep 2010

    Thanks to IV, it was immensely helpful.





    girlfriend gold rush australia kids. gold rush pictures australia. Victorian gold rush Image
  • Victorian gold rush Image



  • nkavjs
    09-20 12:37 PM
    Assistant Chief
    Internal Security and Investigative Operations
    USCIS, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
    Suite 7000
    Washington, DC 20529
    or email: USCIS-COMPLAINT@DHS.GOV

    I would appericiate, few more people can send an email.

    I emailed the complaint just now.Thanks for sharing





    hairstyles first gold rush and is gold rush pictures australia. dresses life in the gold-rush
  • dresses life in the gold-rush



  • kgundamaraju@hotmail.com
    05-22 09:39 AM
    Would anyone be able to advise if I can travel out of the country after I've filed the 485 if I have an approved I-797 approval notice (for H-1B) but old H-1B stamp in pp has already expired?

    If I travel out and then get the H-1B visa stamp at an outside consulate, I would be able to travel back in, but would I have considered have abandoned the 485 application? (since I travelled out without a valid H-1B stamp in pp)??

    Can I travel out even before my AP arrives? Or does having an AP make a difference? I would prefer to stay on H-1B status since you never know what happens to the 140/485 application.

    Thanks for the help guys.

    I am in the same situation as yours. The visa stamp on my passport expired last year and I have an approved I-797, which is valid till Oct'07. I am planning to file for I-485 on June 1st and I want to travel to India as soon as I can. My attorney's advise was to wait for receipt of I-485 application and then travel to India and get H-1B stamped on my passport from a US consulate in India. According to him this is not considered as abandoning I-485.





    GCNeophyte
    08-12 11:28 AM
    Congratulations... and Great tracking :):):)


    Priority Date : December 30, 2001
    State Labor : November 12th, 2002
    Federal Labor : October, 2006
    I140 Applied : November 2006
    I140 Approved : February 2007
    I485 Applied : July 24th, 2007
    I485 Receipt Date : September 13th, 2007
    Biometrics : October, 2007
    Biometrics for kids (second one) : August 2009
    3 EADs : October 2007, August 2008 and August 2010
    3 Advanced Paroles : October 2007, May 2009 (never arrived. lost in mail), December 2009.
    One extra Advanced Parole for family in between.
    Employer Changed : April 2008
    AC21 filed : April 2008
    Second Employer Filed I 140 on July, 2009
    Second I 140 was approved on September 19th, 2009
    Opened SR : August 2nd, 2010
    Status : Approved on August 5th
    CPO Mail : August 6th
    Recieved Approval Notice (797 Notice of Action - Welcome to United States of America) on August 11th, 2010
    Center : Texas Service Center
    Permanent Resident Card : Still awaited





    pvgupt01
    10-06 03:32 PM
    everyone...

    I was a July 2nd filer and my cheque got encashed on Oct 4th 2007:). It feels good :)and from the receipt number on back of my cheque my application is now in texas. All the best to all of you.



    Reacent Post

    0 comments:

    Post a Comment

    Total Pageviews