glen
04-08 10:16 PM
This is like another feather in the hat....
Great job by IV members...
Great job by IV members...
wallpaper Selena Gomez Pregnant With
map_boiler
07-12 12:24 PM
Just trying to sum up the situation from USCIS perspective...
1) DOS releases July visa bulletin making all EB categories current (except for other workers)...hoping to force the USCIS to adjudicate cases and avoid wasting visa numbers as in previous years
2) This infuriates USCIS, and for whatever reasons (this has been debated enough already), they decide to use up all the FY2007 visa numbers in June itself and then force the DOS to revise the July bulletin in June itself...so no one can file in July.
3) Unfortunately, they run into issues going through with their plan of using up all visa numbers in June
4) July 1st and morning of July 2nd...they still are working frantically to use up the numbers to avoid new July filers. But by now, it is July already and they have failed in their original mission (see 2 above). Now they start panicking and do some dumb stuff (in violation of their own regulations). They approve I-485's of some folks who were ready for approval (processing complete and FBI check cleared), but whose dates were not current. They also pre-requested some numbers for folks whose dates were current, but processing was not complete i.e. FBI check was not cleared.
5) Late morning July 2nd: By requesting all available numbers from DOS and exhausting FY2007 quota, they forced DOS to revise the July bulletin, which was unprecedented.
6) July 5th and later: It is now post July-2nd, and USCIS still has cases for which they pre-requested numbers. Now the problem is that even if the FBI check comes through for those cases, they cannot approve them because technically, all numbers have been used up for FY 2007. So they start returning numbers to DOS. They also decide NOT the send the applications of people who filed on July 2nd or later back while they decide on the next course of action...
I think this will have major implications for both USCIS and DOS. The key for USCIS was to exhaust visa numbers on or before June 29th to achieve their obejective without repercussions...and force DOS to revise the bulletin in June itself...and they failed miserably at it.
And now they will have to pay. I know some people are thinking please let USCIS just sweep it under the carpet and just allow us to file our cases...no harm done. But I diasgree...what they have done is shameful. And they should be made to pay for playing with our lives. They should never be able to even think of doing something like this again. And their operations should have direct congress/DOS oversight so they cannot get away with snail-paced processing wasting visas ever again...
1) DOS releases July visa bulletin making all EB categories current (except for other workers)...hoping to force the USCIS to adjudicate cases and avoid wasting visa numbers as in previous years
2) This infuriates USCIS, and for whatever reasons (this has been debated enough already), they decide to use up all the FY2007 visa numbers in June itself and then force the DOS to revise the July bulletin in June itself...so no one can file in July.
3) Unfortunately, they run into issues going through with their plan of using up all visa numbers in June
4) July 1st and morning of July 2nd...they still are working frantically to use up the numbers to avoid new July filers. But by now, it is July already and they have failed in their original mission (see 2 above). Now they start panicking and do some dumb stuff (in violation of their own regulations). They approve I-485's of some folks who were ready for approval (processing complete and FBI check cleared), but whose dates were not current. They also pre-requested some numbers for folks whose dates were current, but processing was not complete i.e. FBI check was not cleared.
5) Late morning July 2nd: By requesting all available numbers from DOS and exhausting FY2007 quota, they forced DOS to revise the July bulletin, which was unprecedented.
6) July 5th and later: It is now post July-2nd, and USCIS still has cases for which they pre-requested numbers. Now the problem is that even if the FBI check comes through for those cases, they cannot approve them because technically, all numbers have been used up for FY 2007. So they start returning numbers to DOS. They also decide NOT the send the applications of people who filed on July 2nd or later back while they decide on the next course of action...
I think this will have major implications for both USCIS and DOS. The key for USCIS was to exhaust visa numbers on or before June 29th to achieve their obejective without repercussions...and force DOS to revise the bulletin in June itself...and they failed miserably at it.
And now they will have to pay. I know some people are thinking please let USCIS just sweep it under the carpet and just allow us to file our cases...no harm done. But I diasgree...what they have done is shameful. And they should be made to pay for playing with our lives. They should never be able to even think of doing something like this again. And their operations should have direct congress/DOS oversight so they cannot get away with snail-paced processing wasting visas ever again...
zj142
07-10 09:01 PM
They probably figured out that accepting those application is actually a better deal comparing with settling a lawsuit with ALIF.
2011 Selena was appearing on The
Brightsider
01-19 11:22 AM
Peace out guys!
Why dont we call it a day on this issue. The OP was venting frustration, and feels entitled to do so. Nothing wrong with that, and there is no need to question his motives or logic. Considering what all of us are going through, there is a lot to be said in favor of letting out steam.
Lest anyone feel offended for anything I have said, I am not being patronizing. Indeed, after five years of wait, I feel like a good crib session will do me good too.
Chill out and enjoy the weather....after weeks of awfully low temp., the sun is out and the weather is glorious.:)
Why dont we call it a day on this issue. The OP was venting frustration, and feels entitled to do so. Nothing wrong with that, and there is no need to question his motives or logic. Considering what all of us are going through, there is a lot to be said in favor of letting out steam.
Lest anyone feel offended for anything I have said, I am not being patronizing. Indeed, after five years of wait, I feel like a good crib session will do me good too.
Chill out and enjoy the weather....after weeks of awfully low temp., the sun is out and the weather is glorious.:)
more...
skgs2000
11-15 12:30 PM
Separate quota for Masters = Chances of that being passed and implementation
date = Feb 31, 2075......:)
date = Feb 31, 2075......:)
swo
07-12 03:08 PM
You don't need your PD to be current for EAD/AP
I think he might have meant that the 485 was prematurely filed too.
I think he might have meant that the 485 was prematurely filed too.
more...
praveenuppaluri
08-18 08:07 PM
rsk73, your job decides if you can get in to EB2 or not. if you are working for MNC and apply for PERM, the current market is bad and they will ask you to wait for 6 more months. so, I don't believe this is a right time for PERM application - my 2 cents
P.S: normally, these kinds of EB3 to EB2 porting questions are a little sensitive in the forums but 12th year H1B.. damn.. you are surely qualified for EB2, problem is, your job should. All the best...
Hi All,
I am on H1B from 1998, 12th year and counting.
.
P.S: normally, these kinds of EB3 to EB2 porting questions are a little sensitive in the forums but 12th year H1B.. damn.. you are surely qualified for EB2, problem is, your job should. All the best...
Hi All,
I am on H1B from 1998, 12th year and counting.
.
2010 selena gomez pregnant. selena
NKR
11-07 03:54 PM
Employer has to show that he can support all the employees that have an 140 pending. It cannot be attributed to being sadistic alone.
However, having an official AC21 process would be good.
I think so too, the employer wants to scr** us while we are with him, but he doesn�t care a rats a** if we are not with him even if we have worked for him for years. The employer has to show ability to pay since GC is for future employment, so he simply revokes 140 to get rid of this burden. The whole system has flaws and Indian EB immigrants are the worst affected.
However, having an official AC21 process would be good.
I think so too, the employer wants to scr** us while we are with him, but he doesn�t care a rats a** if we are not with him even if we have worked for him for years. The employer has to show ability to pay since GC is for future employment, so he simply revokes 140 to get rid of this burden. The whole system has flaws and Indian EB immigrants are the worst affected.
more...
GCAmigo
03-07 02:51 PM
All this would only help the child continue to stay in US with a Legal Status.. But he/she would still be a dependent(H-4) that means cannot do any part-time job & at the same time pay higher tuition fees.. whereas the DREAM Act proposes to give GC status to the children of illegal immigrants.. seems a tad too unfair for those who abide by the law!
hair Selena Gomez Pregnant With
USDream2Dust
04-18 02:19 PM
Isn't it a relief? if the officer calls you for interview, checks your documents and says approved but no GC till PD current? I can live happily with it for couple of years atleast without thinking of GC. The feeling of getting GC in future 100% is almost equal to having GC today. You can change jobs on AC21 without fear and use EAD and AP full force and forget about renewing H1b's
more...
rsayed
02-22 10:56 AM
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070222-121742-6247r.htm
...I don't mean to sound skeptical, but it is my firm belief (after watching the series of events over the last 8 months), that nothing is final till it's final.
Though, this kind of encouraging news pops up every now and then in the media - we have to (as part of the IV group), work toward getting our provisions passed in whichever Immigration Bill that is on the floor for discussion.
It's surprising that IV is the only group representing the "highly skilled group" and though 100s' of thousands have been affected by the "retrogression" phenomena, we have just about 9000 members...
Let's hope something concrete gets done, this year!
Hope 2007 is the year which puts to rest all the uncertainties we face...
...I don't mean to sound skeptical, but it is my firm belief (after watching the series of events over the last 8 months), that nothing is final till it's final.
Though, this kind of encouraging news pops up every now and then in the media - we have to (as part of the IV group), work toward getting our provisions passed in whichever Immigration Bill that is on the floor for discussion.
It's surprising that IV is the only group representing the "highly skilled group" and though 100s' of thousands have been affected by the "retrogression" phenomena, we have just about 9000 members...
Let's hope something concrete gets done, this year!
Hope 2007 is the year which puts to rest all the uncertainties we face...
hot selena gomez pregnant from justin. Selena Gomez amp;amp; Justin
sidbee
05-12 04:54 PM
This thread is a crap fck.
Why are we speculating the dates just for the heck.Pl stop this.
Why are we speculating the dates just for the heck.Pl stop this.
more...
house My Girl (Nelena Pregnancy
Paul Pope
February 4th, 2004, 08:03 PM
Nikon was on the ropes the second they decided that they didn't need
1) to update their DSLR's more then once every 3 years
2) not to make their own chips but to outsource them from sony
Its kinda sad that Nikon have to create FUD about their DSLR sales to create imaginary market share. I have it on good authority that their market share of the worldwide DSLR market is under 30%.
The failure of the D2H to be even remotely competitive with the 1D Mk 11 even though both cameras had similar development cycles is simply a embarrassment.
1) to update their DSLR's more then once every 3 years
2) not to make their own chips but to outsource them from sony
Its kinda sad that Nikon have to create FUD about their DSLR sales to create imaginary market share. I have it on good authority that their market share of the worldwide DSLR market is under 30%.
The failure of the D2H to be even remotely competitive with the 1D Mk 11 even though both cameras had similar development cycles is simply a embarrassment.
tattoo hairstyles selena gomez
nozerd
08-07 02:34 PM
You dont have to get NEXUS. It is easier if you do, but you dont Have to.
The wait during regular commute hours in mostly 15 mins. There may be exceptions. However your facts are wrong. NEXUS is not a reqt.
Yes you will need a stable job in Detroit. I am not in IT. I would be transfering to Detroit office of my company but serving same clients that I am serving currently.
The wait during regular commute hours in mostly 15 mins. There may be exceptions. However your facts are wrong. NEXUS is not a reqt.
Yes you will need a stable job in Detroit. I am not in IT. I would be transfering to Detroit office of my company but serving same clients that I am serving currently.
more...
pictures selena gomez pregnant.
ramineni11
03-24 11:02 AM
Harvard university and boston University are looking for dbas. Go to their site and search.
I guess they do H1 sponcership too (if required)
I guess they do H1 sponcership too (if required)
dresses selena gomez pregnant from
wata
09-29 12:30 PM
Thanks,
I think so. I have one of my friend. His case got transfer to Texas. He filed 2 months earlier than me. He got approved already in late August.
Thanks,
Wata,
If I were you, I would rather wait atleast till Nov 2006 before converting I-140case to premium processing because as you said NSC is currently processing I-485 cases for Dec 2005 and it would take 5/6 months more from now to come to June/July 2006 to process I-485 at current pace. But Again this is my personal thought....
Moreover, in order to take advantage of AC21 portability you I-140/I-485 case has to be 6 months old. So getting I-140 approved through premium processing does no good as you would have to wait till Dec 2006 anyway for your I-140/I-485 case to become 6 months old.
Thanks,
Law Loving Alien
I think so. I have one of my friend. His case got transfer to Texas. He filed 2 months earlier than me. He got approved already in late August.
Thanks,
Wata,
If I were you, I would rather wait atleast till Nov 2006 before converting I-140case to premium processing because as you said NSC is currently processing I-485 cases for Dec 2005 and it would take 5/6 months more from now to come to June/July 2006 to process I-485 at current pace. But Again this is my personal thought....
Moreover, in order to take advantage of AC21 portability you I-140/I-485 case has to be 6 months old. So getting I-140 approved through premium processing does no good as you would have to wait till Dec 2006 anyway for your I-140/I-485 case to become 6 months old.
Thanks,
Law Loving Alien
more...
makeup selena gomez pregnant from justin. selena gomez pregnant by
GCBy3000
07-19 05:24 PM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10614
You will know what I am talking. USCIS folks are dumb a.. and sitting on AOS applications for long time. The direction is clearly coming from TOP. After July VB fiasco, they cannot sit on it as they have created landmines. They lied in the past about the processing delays for lack of resources. If they decide to stand by that lie, then they are creating landmines for themselves towards future. If they dont stand by that lie, then any small mistake will be exposed with seveal questions from outside. The only way out is to go to Pappa and ask for his signature on the solution. They have all the solutions and we dont have to tell them any.
You will know what I am talking. USCIS folks are dumb a.. and sitting on AOS applications for long time. The direction is clearly coming from TOP. After July VB fiasco, they cannot sit on it as they have created landmines. They lied in the past about the processing delays for lack of resources. If they decide to stand by that lie, then they are creating landmines for themselves towards future. If they dont stand by that lie, then any small mistake will be exposed with seveal questions from outside. The only way out is to go to Pappa and ask for his signature on the solution. They have all the solutions and we dont have to tell them any.
girlfriend Justin Bieber + Selena Gomez
paskal
07-25 09:01 PM
mean NOTHING.
My I-140 was approved in June.
Even as of now- the processing date in NSC for EB2-NIW is Feb 07.
My EAD was approved in July, has the NSC processing officially reached my RD? of course NOT! It's still stuck on April 16th.
The dates are a joke.
My I-140 was approved in June.
Even as of now- the processing date in NSC for EB2-NIW is Feb 07.
My EAD was approved in July, has the NSC processing officially reached my RD? of course NOT! It's still stuck on April 16th.
The dates are a joke.
hairstyles selena gomez pregnant justin
pd_recapturing
10-19 11:14 AM
If your both I-140 has been approved then your new PD needs not to be current for interfiling. But make sure that your to-be-used I-140, PD must have captured.
Naveen
06-20 09:49 AM
What if your state does not have a state chapter?
If you wish the entire immigrationvoice community to assist then some sharing of updates will be necessary outside of these.
What he said!
it is ok to contact any of the leaders for the update
you can link with a neighboring chapter, right now this is an action item being coordinated by the chapters so they have the info.
http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=72&Itemid=52
If you wish the entire immigrationvoice community to assist then some sharing of updates will be necessary outside of these.
What he said!
it is ok to contact any of the leaders for the update
you can link with a neighboring chapter, right now this is an action item being coordinated by the chapters so they have the info.
http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=72&Itemid=52
csbbay
05-24 01:10 PM
sent
0 comments:
Post a Comment