LostInGCProcess
10-07 11:00 AM
Truly a tragic incident. There is no excuse, what so ever, to take someones life and to commit suicide. No matter what the hardship, it has to be faced and move forward. Indians are too emotional and take it so personal and worry more about what others think.
wallpaper 2011 DS Winx Club 0.3 Amore
FrankZulu
08-26 07:59 PM
Hi Guys please help me
Yesterday i got my receipt i check the status online the status is saying
Receipt Number: LINXXXXXXXX
Application Type: I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Current Status: Fingerprint fee rejected and notice mailed; case in suspense.
On August 21, 2007, we rejected your fingerprint fee and mailed you instructions for how to submit the necessary payment. This case is now in suspense.
Please submit your payment with our notice as soon as possible after you receive our notice so we may resume processing of this case.
But USCIS cashed my checks i didn't know what went worng the total amount i paid is 325+70,170,180.
Did any guys get same kind of problem?
You paid the right amount.
$745 (485+FP+AP+EAD)
Yesterday i got my receipt i check the status online the status is saying
Receipt Number: LINXXXXXXXX
Application Type: I485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS
Current Status: Fingerprint fee rejected and notice mailed; case in suspense.
On August 21, 2007, we rejected your fingerprint fee and mailed you instructions for how to submit the necessary payment. This case is now in suspense.
Please submit your payment with our notice as soon as possible after you receive our notice so we may resume processing of this case.
But USCIS cashed my checks i didn't know what went worng the total amount i paid is 325+70,170,180.
Did any guys get same kind of problem?
You paid the right amount.
$745 (485+FP+AP+EAD)
sumitmathur
08-21 02:02 PM
I called USCIS regarding this issue. Representative mentioned that once u have GC, it is your choice if you want to change jobs. There is no rule stating that you have to stick to your employer who sponsered GC for any period of time. He also mentioned that changing job after getting GC does not affect citizenship application.
BTW, I got my GC on 08/08/08.
BTW, I got my GC on 08/08/08.
2011 amore winx club.
skdskd
08-27 10:19 AM
I must agree - both are important..it is just each one of us have different cases and circumstances
that It might be important for OP but you should considerate about others you should not say that every body elses problem is nothing in-front of OP's problem ."Injustice" word sound like that.
as somebody said earlier abount OP tha it sounds selfish and mean.
When NSC people were getting Receipt and TSC were waiting , no body said ."Injustice" word .
So when it is not affecting you it 's fair.....But somebody else gets that you cry foul play ....Be considerate about others
Personally I wish all (NSC ,TSC , Carlifornia , Vermont ) filers should get there receipt , EAD and AP as well as Final GC as soon as possible
that It might be important for OP but you should considerate about others you should not say that every body elses problem is nothing in-front of OP's problem ."Injustice" word sound like that.
as somebody said earlier abount OP tha it sounds selfish and mean.
When NSC people were getting Receipt and TSC were waiting , no body said ."Injustice" word .
So when it is not affecting you it 's fair.....But somebody else gets that you cry foul play ....Be considerate about others
Personally I wish all (NSC ,TSC , Carlifornia , Vermont ) filers should get there receipt , EAD and AP as well as Final GC as soon as possible
more...
SL%%
07-20 01:17 AM
Are the processing times according to the notice date or the received date ? Mine are 4 months apart.
It is based on Received date but some are saying that CIS is not really following that but in "THEORY", its the RCVD Date.
It is based on Received date but some are saying that CIS is not really following that but in "THEORY", its the RCVD Date.
sbabunle
01-26 06:45 PM
Anirudh
Its sad situation, people are walking away or feeling bad becaus
of IVs decision about I485 filing. Couple of core members already
file 485 and still they support it. Even I filed my I485 2 years ago.
There are 2 things here.
1) Think about people who file their labors 3 or 4 years ago and got I140 approved or in the filing process. If a lay off or something happens they will lose everything. All these years wait, frustration everything... whereas if you have file I485 you have a chance to shift jobs. Their only chance is to file I485.
2) 485 filed people think they will be affected. Thats why they are opposing it. But the point is that since the whole thing is going based on priority date,
it doesn't matter much. With present situations if a person has a PD older than you, he/she will get GC before you for sure (90%). Even if his /hers LC is still pending.( Because PD will move very slow. For EB3 to advance an year it would take 2 years. By the time all the old LCs will be cleared.) I dont see anything to be concerned here. Because we all are fucked up so badly :) :) :) :). Take a deep breath and think about it. The only way out is to collect a ton of money and lobby very hard.
So I request you to work actively, induct more members, contribute
more money to our cause. We will win soon man!!!!!
I made a one time contribution myself but I have a feeling that IV is going away from the goal of increasing EB visas and just focusing on the 485 filing.Many people that have contributed earlier feel that by prioritizing the 485 filing over increase of EB visas, IV has gone away from atleast some of stakeholders .The stakeholders were promised initially that increase of EB visas would be a top priority or atleast on a even keel with any other objectives, but now we are in phased approach.I have talked to lot of people and the feeling is same.
Its sad situation, people are walking away or feeling bad becaus
of IVs decision about I485 filing. Couple of core members already
file 485 and still they support it. Even I filed my I485 2 years ago.
There are 2 things here.
1) Think about people who file their labors 3 or 4 years ago and got I140 approved or in the filing process. If a lay off or something happens they will lose everything. All these years wait, frustration everything... whereas if you have file I485 you have a chance to shift jobs. Their only chance is to file I485.
2) 485 filed people think they will be affected. Thats why they are opposing it. But the point is that since the whole thing is going based on priority date,
it doesn't matter much. With present situations if a person has a PD older than you, he/she will get GC before you for sure (90%). Even if his /hers LC is still pending.( Because PD will move very slow. For EB3 to advance an year it would take 2 years. By the time all the old LCs will be cleared.) I dont see anything to be concerned here. Because we all are fucked up so badly :) :) :) :). Take a deep breath and think about it. The only way out is to collect a ton of money and lobby very hard.
So I request you to work actively, induct more members, contribute
more money to our cause. We will win soon man!!!!!
I made a one time contribution myself but I have a feeling that IV is going away from the goal of increasing EB visas and just focusing on the 485 filing.Many people that have contributed earlier feel that by prioritizing the 485 filing over increase of EB visas, IV has gone away from atleast some of stakeholders .The stakeholders were promised initially that increase of EB visas would be a top priority or atleast on a even keel with any other objectives, but now we are in phased approach.I have talked to lot of people and the feeling is same.
more...
krishnam70
10-02 06:18 PM
Hello Krishnam
Since your GC is for future employment, your current employer might not be able to support you on H1 but you can always get them to support you for future employment and so they can still not revoke your 140 petition process. So if possible be on good terms with them and ask them to keep your 140 process intact
I have a I-485 pending, and there is a chance I may be laid off after 180 days. Would I have to have another similar job offer at hand, or can I still continue looking for a job after 180 days of I-485 till I find one ?
Thank you for your help.
1. What is your current status? H1/EAD? 140 approved/in process
a) If 140 is approved and you filed 485 and its been 180 days and if you meanwhile have an EAD in hand,
a1) then you can move to a new employer using the EAD or
a2) transfer H1 and have no problems with GC process.
If USCIS asks you then you say you are using AC21. At that time since your 140 is approved/contains all required initial evidence USCIS will not ask anything more. If they do however ask then your new company will need to provide all the required information again.
Required initial evidence, as specified under 8 CFR 204.5(g)(2), includes copies of: (1) annual reports, (2) federal tax returns, or (3) audited financial statements. The petitioner must submit a copy of at least one of these required documents
There is big thread on this forum somewhere about Initial evidence. Search should reveal it
b)If 140 is pending and you filed 485 and its been 180 days but you dont have an EAD, if 140 petition is not withdrawn then you can find an employer to support your H1 ( assuming you are on H1. Not sure abt L1 case)
-goodluck
Since your GC is for future employment, your current employer might not be able to support you on H1 but you can always get them to support you for future employment and so they can still not revoke your 140 petition process. So if possible be on good terms with them and ask them to keep your 140 process intact
I have a I-485 pending, and there is a chance I may be laid off after 180 days. Would I have to have another similar job offer at hand, or can I still continue looking for a job after 180 days of I-485 till I find one ?
Thank you for your help.
1. What is your current status? H1/EAD? 140 approved/in process
a) If 140 is approved and you filed 485 and its been 180 days and if you meanwhile have an EAD in hand,
a1) then you can move to a new employer using the EAD or
a2) transfer H1 and have no problems with GC process.
If USCIS asks you then you say you are using AC21. At that time since your 140 is approved/contains all required initial evidence USCIS will not ask anything more. If they do however ask then your new company will need to provide all the required information again.
Required initial evidence, as specified under 8 CFR 204.5(g)(2), includes copies of: (1) annual reports, (2) federal tax returns, or (3) audited financial statements. The petitioner must submit a copy of at least one of these required documents
There is big thread on this forum somewhere about Initial evidence. Search should reveal it
b)If 140 is pending and you filed 485 and its been 180 days but you dont have an EAD, if 140 petition is not withdrawn then you can find an employer to support your H1 ( assuming you are on H1. Not sure abt L1 case)
-goodluck
2010 amore winx club.
siravi
11-20 05:06 PM
nihar, is this "consultant" your attorney? You should contact an immigration attorney with your concerns; not familiar at all with "lottery" H1B, so have no information.
Good luck.
Good luck.
more...
superdoc
08-27 01:02 PM
Guys,
I took an info pass last week to check the status of my case. Specifically to check whether the interfile is success or not. IO at USCIS office mentioned that she cannot check whether my case is in EB2 or EB3. I am surprised to hear that. Gurus any has this kind of experience?
Also, She mentioned that my case is assigned to an Officer on August 13th. Do any one has any info how many days(on average), an Office will take to approve a case. Any info. is helpful to me and all.
Overall the Field Office people were polite.
Thanks,
Thun.
my file has been with officer since aug 1...no news ..and now the #'s are all gone....
I took an info pass last week to check the status of my case. Specifically to check whether the interfile is success or not. IO at USCIS office mentioned that she cannot check whether my case is in EB2 or EB3. I am surprised to hear that. Gurus any has this kind of experience?
Also, She mentioned that my case is assigned to an Officer on August 13th. Do any one has any info how many days(on average), an Office will take to approve a case. Any info. is helpful to me and all.
Overall the Field Office people were polite.
Thanks,
Thun.
my file has been with officer since aug 1...no news ..and now the #'s are all gone....
hair amore winx club. Winx Club cine+tv : yodibujo. Winx Club cine+tv : yodibujo.
jonty_11
07-19 05:47 PM
since this thread starts with Lofgren.....she seems to be a good soul for IV core to contact and get our woes heard....I am sure IV core was involved in discussions with her team during the VB fiasco....so she should be aware..of our issues
more...
telekinesis
05-26 12:33 PM
Nice volley, I love it!
Whoa, you are in a battle with everyone. :P
Hopefully have mine done soon. Oh crap, I'm late for work, talk to you later.
Whoa, you are in a battle with everyone. :P
Hopefully have mine done soon. Oh crap, I'm late for work, talk to you later.
hot Winx Club Pixies
.jpg "Winx Club Life Is Almost Magic")
msp1976
10-19 04:19 PM
Not really, broadly speaking lack of information can never be a benefit to consumer. (Read: hidden clauses in agreements). It might be that they have been doing that and we don't know. You will ONLY know if you apply for another H1B transfer or any other application say I-140/I-485 with new employer and then USCIS MIGHT tell you that your I-140 is revoked on MM/DD/YYYY and you are no longer in valid H1B status since then. That would be too late and it is not retroactive. Remember that onus is on you to maintain valid H1B status all the time during the period of H1B. Once again I am not saying what I mention above is the correct interpretation of law, but in the absence of any clarify it can be one of the implication.
well...The history is that USCIS did release the proposed regulation dealing with all these back in 2002 if I remember correctly..Then there was a comment period...They got so many comments...that after that they did not even bother to publish the regulations in the federal register...That was the last heard of it....Now the only time when the issue of these regulations can possibliy come up is when there is a leadership change in USCIS...Any our fate would depend on who is in control of USCIS at that particular instance...
But this sword would fall some day..I donot know when..I donot know if it would fall on us....or we would just steer clear....The thing is that there is a lot of resistance to changes in status quo both inside USCIS and AILA...
Well AILA would want the status quo to continue....Them lawyers are making money of us anyway.....
I am in US last 7 years...The career is stagnant..No sign of GC anywhere....I am very despondent...But then what else is new ???
well...The history is that USCIS did release the proposed regulation dealing with all these back in 2002 if I remember correctly..Then there was a comment period...They got so many comments...that after that they did not even bother to publish the regulations in the federal register...That was the last heard of it....Now the only time when the issue of these regulations can possibliy come up is when there is a leadership change in USCIS...Any our fate would depend on who is in control of USCIS at that particular instance...
But this sword would fall some day..I donot know when..I donot know if it would fall on us....or we would just steer clear....The thing is that there is a lot of resistance to changes in status quo both inside USCIS and AILA...
Well AILA would want the status quo to continue....Them lawyers are making money of us anyway.....
I am in US last 7 years...The career is stagnant..No sign of GC anywhere....I am very despondent...But then what else is new ???
more...
house amore winx club. amore winx club; amore winx club. sofila. Nov 14, 09:46 AM
anura
04-11 04:10 PM
How much money you have donated?
With due respect, Sir, this thread is entitled, "do YOU have a question?". Not "do YOU have an answer?". In the first place, did you have an answer to the person whom you questioned?
With due respect, Sir, this thread is entitled, "do YOU have a question?". Not "do YOU have an answer?". In the first place, did you have an answer to the person whom you questioned?
tattoo pictures amore winx club. amore winx club. amore winx club.
EkAurAaya
08-07 10:44 PM
Noone is forcing them to be ehre - you are saying. And I am saying: nobody should be forcing them out, either. They are ehre because they want to be here and because they want to discuss something with other people who are here - administrative problems or philosohpical issues.
Being here and being a part are two different things, you are either for or against a thing, if you are for eb improvement then be 100% for it - not i m EB2 so i support eb2 or I'm masters so i support masters, such discussions are fruitless and meaningless... we don't need this
'You should trust the organization in what they do' - you are saying. The organization should not be perceived as an abstract, 'know-it-all' deity that we, tiny humans have to blidnly follow. The organization is us collectively and we should not be following it, but leading it or at least taking it somewhere. Sometimes the road is straight and goes forward, sometimes there seem to be multiple roads that need exploring which may or may not coverge again. Sometimes the journey is not continuous and you need to stop, consult a map or a compass and realing yourself. There is nothing wrong with that. There should never be blind trust because that will sooner or later drive us all down the cliffs.
Everyone is intelligent enough to know whats right and whats wrong... if you feel what an organization is doing is wrong then do not associate yourself with it. If you see a cliff ahead then there is a good chance everyone else will see it too if there is one.... but dont start yelling i see a cliff i see a cliff (when there is none) follow me follow me and disperse the group
'If you have ideas talk to the core and discuss with them in person' - that is exactly what we are doing. Throwing around ideas and discussing them amongst ourselves. Sometimes the discussion is easy and disciplined and constructive and sometimes it is hard and confrontational and destructive. I think that if it is too confrontational or too destrcutive that indicates that not all is well within the group - I would refrain from calling it an organization just yet - and the ideas are not mature or ready yet and/or the group is not really cohesive and it is really not one group. Both of which are problems that need to be addressed and dealt with. By stifling discussion and censoring out ideas that you do not like, you are doing a disservice to the entire group because the group has to discover what is the cause of the destructive confrontation otherwise it cannot successfully function and fulfill its objectives.
You are not doing what you think you are... if you have solid ideas call the core, they know a lot more then what we do about how things work when it comes to lobbying. I guess you only have to look at the flower campane to know what organization and unity means, thanks to their efforts USCIS reversed there decision!
Being here and being a part are two different things, you are either for or against a thing, if you are for eb improvement then be 100% for it - not i m EB2 so i support eb2 or I'm masters so i support masters, such discussions are fruitless and meaningless... we don't need this
'You should trust the organization in what they do' - you are saying. The organization should not be perceived as an abstract, 'know-it-all' deity that we, tiny humans have to blidnly follow. The organization is us collectively and we should not be following it, but leading it or at least taking it somewhere. Sometimes the road is straight and goes forward, sometimes there seem to be multiple roads that need exploring which may or may not coverge again. Sometimes the journey is not continuous and you need to stop, consult a map or a compass and realing yourself. There is nothing wrong with that. There should never be blind trust because that will sooner or later drive us all down the cliffs.
Everyone is intelligent enough to know whats right and whats wrong... if you feel what an organization is doing is wrong then do not associate yourself with it. If you see a cliff ahead then there is a good chance everyone else will see it too if there is one.... but dont start yelling i see a cliff i see a cliff (when there is none) follow me follow me and disperse the group
'If you have ideas talk to the core and discuss with them in person' - that is exactly what we are doing. Throwing around ideas and discussing them amongst ourselves. Sometimes the discussion is easy and disciplined and constructive and sometimes it is hard and confrontational and destructive. I think that if it is too confrontational or too destrcutive that indicates that not all is well within the group - I would refrain from calling it an organization just yet - and the ideas are not mature or ready yet and/or the group is not really cohesive and it is really not one group. Both of which are problems that need to be addressed and dealt with. By stifling discussion and censoring out ideas that you do not like, you are doing a disservice to the entire group because the group has to discover what is the cause of the destructive confrontation otherwise it cannot successfully function and fulfill its objectives.
You are not doing what you think you are... if you have solid ideas call the core, they know a lot more then what we do about how things work when it comes to lobbying. I guess you only have to look at the flower campane to know what organization and unity means, thanks to their efforts USCIS reversed there decision!
more...
pictures The Winx Club by étincelles; amore winx club. S-WINXCLUB-PIXIE
wahwah
04-03 08:22 PM
dont worry about actual salary being higher than LC salary.
i had the same issue last year...my bonus put my total salary over $50K than what was listed on the LC. i checked with my lawyers and they said that was fine.
Just curious - Have you heard of a case being rejected just because the salary was higher than the original LC ?? (Assuming job title/description are same or similar). I think it will be almost impossible for them to reject just because is higher!! Govt. cannot dictate the upper limit of salaries (in private sector).
i had the same issue last year...my bonus put my total salary over $50K than what was listed on the LC. i checked with my lawyers and they said that was fine.
Just curious - Have you heard of a case being rejected just because the salary was higher than the original LC ?? (Assuming job title/description are same or similar). I think it will be almost impossible for them to reject just because is higher!! Govt. cannot dictate the upper limit of salaries (in private sector).
dresses Winx Club Life Is Almost Magic
.bmp "amore winx club. amore winx club. amore winx club. GCard_Dream")
Gravitation
12-16 10:24 AM
Legalese was never my strong point. Which part says that EB-1 unused must go to EB-2 of same category, and then to EB-3?
None. USCIS has discretion on it and it has choses that to be the case.
None. USCIS has discretion on it and it has choses that to be the case.
more...
makeup Mon blog : Amore Winx Romantic
zj142
07-10 09:25 PM
It would be a smart choice to accept those application, but based on USCIS recent behaviors, I really doubt their decision makers have that intelligence to make such a smart choice.
girlfriend amore winx club
waitnwatch
05-06 01:02 PM
Some states have the provision that instate tuition rates will only apply to permanent residents while others allow H1-B's to avail of instate tuition. I know for sure that Pennsylvania is in the permanent resident camp while Colorado allows instate to H1-B's. As mentioned previously it is the state legislature along with the commision on higher education which create the rules.
It would be interesting to compile a list of all 50 states to see where each state stands. To do that though it would help if folks residing in different states chime in. Otherwise it would be too difficult to sift through the higher education commission websites for each individual state.
It would be interesting to compile a list of all 50 states to see where each state stands. To do that though it would help if folks residing in different states chime in. Otherwise it would be too difficult to sift through the higher education commission websites for each individual state.
hairstyles amore: Immagine ginger:
skilledWorker
09-19 01:58 AM
Truly awesome.. 1500 is still a big number and I sincerely appreciate all the volunteers for spending countless hours organizing this rally.
Congrats once again to all the people who made it to the rally and participating in a historic event.
Go IV...
Congrats once again to all the people who made it to the rally and participating in a historic event.
Go IV...
diptam
03-25 11:49 AM
My Vermont ext says received on Jan 9th and i see a LUD on Feb 17th but after that pindrop silence - no movement.
Dont understand what that LUD means , earlier i always got approval within 7-15 days of LUD from Vermont.
H1B Extension received Dt 02/20/2008. Based on this thread I have to wait another 4 to 5 months.:confused:
Dont understand what that LUD means , earlier i always got approval within 7-15 days of LUD from Vermont.
H1B Extension received Dt 02/20/2008. Based on this thread I have to wait another 4 to 5 months.:confused:
satish_hello
09-21 10:48 AM
I got my EAD Physical CARD for both of us, and AP Approved and received yesterday.Waiting for FP
-satish
----------------------------------------------
EB2/PD-Sept'2004/I-140 Approved @NSC .
I-485 - Sent July6th. @NSC----> Transferred CSC(WAC)---> back to NSC again.
EAD- Card Received
AP - Approved.
FP- ?
AD -?
---------------------------------
Contributed $100 for Rally.
-satish
----------------------------------------------
EB2/PD-Sept'2004/I-140 Approved @NSC .
I-485 - Sent July6th. @NSC----> Transferred CSC(WAC)---> back to NSC again.
EAD- Card Received
AP - Approved.
FP- ?
AD -?
---------------------------------
Contributed $100 for Rally.
0 comments:
Post a Comment